Different forwarder for certain response ip (result ip )

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Sat Sep 16 10:59:24 UTC 2017

Am 16.09.2017 um 12:50 schrieb Alberto Colosi:
> even on hotel ......... why not to use a BIND on unix or window on ur 
> box u r using ?

did you read what i repsoned and too and did you try to understand my 

a default bind with recursion won't work when it can't connect to the 
world in case it is redirected to a hotel nameserver and when you can 
only connect to 80/443, well then your BIND on the box you are using may 
use a nameserver you own in the web running on 443

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* bind-users <bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org> on behalf of 
> Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 16, 2017 12:46 PM
> *To:* bind-users at lists.isc.org
> *Subject:* Re: Different forwarder for certain response ip (result ip )
> Am 16.09.2017 um 12:32 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
>> 1. who runs DNS servers on port 443?
> likely people which where bitten by hotel access points where 53 is
> catched to a internal nameserver and outgoing only 80/443 are possible,
> the same reason many people have a VPN server on 443

More information about the bind-users mailing list