Which one performs good RPZ or Zones with Include statment
gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net
Wed Apr 18 18:46:46 UTC 2018
On 04/18/2018 11:52 AM, Blason R wrote:
> Pertaining to my other thread since I am building sinkhole server which
> will eventually have around 0.5 million zones or may be 1 Million which
> one would you think will perform better?
> RPZ or include statements? I have 8 Core Processor and 32 GB of RAM
Which holds more watter; a banana or a hammer?
An RPZ is a specail type of zone and include statements are ways to
create a zone from multiple files.
You can easily have your RPZ zone file include contents from other files.
I suspect you are meaning to ask, which performs better, a single RPZ
covering LOTS of domains, or multiple discreet zones with each covering
one domain (including sub-domains). — I suspect that RPZ will win in
that I expect it will require fewer resources. I say this because a
single RPZ can have records that impact multiple domains in the single
zone file, compared to needing multiple zones (and files) using the
traditional non-RPZ method.
Grant. . . .
unix || die
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3982 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the bind-users