Which one performs good RPZ or Zones with Include statment
blason16 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 18 18:56:19 UTC 2018
Will the performance be same, considering the number of zones I have or
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Grant Taylor via bind-users <
bind-users at lists.isc.org> wrote:
> On 04/18/2018 11:52 AM, Blason R wrote:
>> Pertaining to my other thread since I am building sinkhole server which
>> will eventually have around 0.5 million zones or may be 1 Million which one
>> would you think will perform better?
>> RPZ or include statements? I have 8 Core Processor and 32 GB of RAM
> Which holds more watter; a banana or a hammer?
> An RPZ is a specail type of zone and include statements are ways to create
> a zone from multiple files.
> You can easily have your RPZ zone file include contents from other files.
> I suspect you are meaning to ask, which performs better, a single RPZ
> covering LOTS of domains, or multiple discreet zones with each covering one
> domain (including sub-domains). — I suspect that RPZ will win in that I
> expect it will require fewer resources. I say this because a single RPZ
> can have records that impact multiple domains in the single zone file,
> compared to needing multiple zones (and files) using the traditional
> non-RPZ method.
> Grant. . . .
> unix || die
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bind-users