Minimum TTL?
Grant Taylor
gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net
Fri Feb 9 22:13:35 UTC 2018
On 02/09/2018 09:37 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> As long as you understand the implications of what you're doing?
I don't think my level of understanding has any impact of my ability to
override what the zone publisher sets the desired TTL (or any value) to be.
I have the right to run my network the way that I want to, even in my
ignorance or while shooting myself in the foot.
> The zone owner may be using short TTLs to implement load balancing and/or
> quick failover. If you extend the TTLs, your users may experience poor
> performance when they try to go to these sites using out-of-date cache
> entries.
Again, by choosing to do something, as questionable as it may be, I am
also choosing the responsibility for the outcome, for better or for worse.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3982 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20180209/eefc4783/attachment.bin>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list