warren at kumari.net
Tue Sep 18 20:21:35 UTC 2018
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM SIMON BABY <simonkbaby at gmail.com> wrote:
> Are we support load balancing with latest DNSSEC ? I have a DNSSEC
> application with unbound library. Do i have to add any extra configuration
> to support Load Balancing?
Your question is sufficiently light on detail that it cannot be
What sort of load balancing?
1: Traditional SLB - you hand out one IP address, and have a load balancer
widget which shares this to multiple backends?
2: Global SLB - you hand out different IP addresses to different clients?
3: Round Robin - you hand out different IP addresses, but randomly / in a
order, not tied to specific clients?
4: Anycast - you hand out the same IP address, but this lives on multiple
sites, and routing takes care of getting people to the closest site?
5: Multiple nameservers? Something else?
The term "load balance" is very vague / can be applied to multiple things -
for all of the above except #2, this should just work without any changes.
GSLB *may* require more work, but may not. # 5 is sufficiently undefined
that it cannot really be answered :-)
What *exactly* is the question / scenario you are asking?
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bind-users