simonkbaby at gmail.com
Tue Sep 18 21:39:55 UTC 2018
I am looking DNS RR distribution. (DNS Round Robin Load distribution).
Round robin DNS is often used to load balance requests between a number of Web
servers <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_server>. For example, a company
has one domain name and three identical copies of the same web site
residing on three servers with three different IP addresses. When one user
accesses the home page it will be sent to the first IP address. The second
user who accesses the home page will be sent to the next IP address, and
the third user will be sent to the third IP address. In each case, once the
IP address is given out, it goes to the end of the list. The fourth user,
therefore, will be sent to the first IP address, and so forth.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:22 PM Warren Kumari <warren at kumari.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM SIMON BABY <simonkbaby at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Are we support load balancing with latest DNSSEC ? I have a DNSSEC
>> application with unbound library. Do i have to add any extra configuration
>> to support Load Balancing?
> Your question is sufficiently light on detail that it cannot be
> realistically answered.
> What sort of load balancing?
> 1: Traditional SLB - you hand out one IP address, and have a load balancer
> widget which shares this to multiple backends?
> 2: Global SLB - you hand out different IP addresses to different clients?
> 3: Round Robin - you hand out different IP addresses, but randomly / in a
> order, not tied to specific clients?
> 4: Anycast - you hand out the same IP address, but this lives on multiple
> sites, and routing takes care of getting people to the closest site?
> 5: Multiple nameservers? Something else?
> The term "load balance" is very vague / can be applied to multiple things
> - for all of the above except #2, this should just work without any
> changes. GSLB *may* require more work, but may not. # 5 is sufficiently
> undefined that it cannot really be answered :-)
> What *exactly* is the question / scenario you are asking?
>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
>> unsubscribe from this list
>> bind-users mailing list
>> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea
> in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bind-users