A policy for removing named.conf options.

[@lbutlr]

On 13 Jun2019, at 17:48, Browne, Stuart via bind-users <bind-users at lists.isc.org> wrote:
> For options that have passed their warning phase and have been removed, I'm all for BIND failing to start and named-checkconf erroring out , rather than quietly ignoring them.

Yes, I think this is the best way, otherwise there will be useless kruft getting in the way forever.


-- 
The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a
little way past them into the impossible.