Two copies of recent posts
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uhlar at fantomas.sk
Thu Nov 26 10:28:59 UTC 2020
On 26.11.20 13:01, Mark Andrews wrote:
>The message that generated this thread had the following:
>To: upendra.gandhi at gmail.com
>Cc: bind-users <bind-users at lists.isc.org>, BIND Users <bind-users at isc.org>
I have mentioned this 3 days ago, this info apparently got missed.
> Note the 2 different addresses for bind-users. Both where delivered to
> lists.isc.org in a single SMTP transaction as you noted (ESMTP id
> 026B967ED73) because the MTA worked out they both needed to be delivered
> to the same server. They where then sent through 2 different instances
> mailman. One for bind-users at lists.isc.org and one for bind-users at isc.org
> and re-injected (ESMTP id B380C67F367 and ESMTP id E414B67F36E).
2 mailman instaces or 2 mails to mailman, thus to the list?
This is not the first time it happened, it happed to me iirc already, when
ISC changed to mailman:
maybe ISC could stop accepting the mails to old addresses?
>> On 26 Nov 2020, at 12:35, Paul Kosinski via bind-users <bind-users at lists.isc.org> wrote:
>> Yes indeed: I sent the last email (and this one) to bind-users and CC-ed
>> to you. That explains why there are two different ESMTP IDs.
>> The question is, have you, like I have, received two copies of any emails
>> (from lists.isc.org) where there *identical* ESMTP IDs in their
>> associated sequences of "Received:" headers. This would indicate that
>> the duplication was caused by an intermediate MTA. (The one I previously
>> indicated was mx.pao1.isc.org, which is the one and only MX for
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Boost your system's speed by 500% - DEL C:\WINDOWS\*.*
More information about the bind-users