Two copies of recent posts
h.reindl at thelounge.net
Wed Nov 25 10:13:08 UTC 2020
Am 25.11.20 um 04:46 schrieb Jim Popovitch via bind-users:
> On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 22:22 -0500, Paul Kosinski wrote:
>> My reading of the headers (below) does *not* suggest "Reply All".
>> Rather, they show that mx.pao1.isc.org sent/forwarded the email once,
>> and it was received by lists.isc.org once with ESMTP ID 026B967ED73.
>> But then lists.isc.org resent/forwarded it more than once, as it was
>> received a few seconds later by lists.isc.org (again!) with two
>> *different* ESMTP IDs: B380C67F367 and E414B67F36E.
>> This suggests to me that lists.isc.org is being a bit too diligent in
>> delivering its email.
> I just received 2 copies of your post, with 2 different ESMTP IDs...
> because you sent it to 2 different recipients. That same thing would
> happen if you sent it to bind-users at lists.isc.org and
> bind-users at lists.isc.org.
are list servers still that bad?
our lmtpd kills even real "reply-all" duplicates
the point is that the message in question was *not* a reply-all. i got
one identical too in a thread i never where active and simply deleted it
long before that subject appeared
More information about the bind-users