AW: Does BIND supports ANAME RR

Klaus Darilion klaus.darilion at
Mon Aug 9 12:37:00 UTC 2021

> On 09.08.21 13:55, Klaus Darilion via bind-users wrote:
> >But honestly SVCB will not solve the ANAME problem.  I will take years
> > until all resolvers/client would support SVCB whereas ANAME would be
> > implemented in the authoritative name server
> resolving on authoritative server could in fact help, and wouldn't need
> protocol
> change at all, but the problem above is crucial (what would you do in case
> of failure? refuse whole zone?)

Resolving is done when there is an incoming query, not on zone loading. So if the auth's resolver (either a full blown resolver or a stub resolver which forwards to another resolver) fails to resolve I would just forward this error to the client's resolver.


More information about the bind-users mailing list