IXFR under 8.2.2-P5?
Kevin J. Dunlap
kevind at metaip.checkpoint.com
Mon Jan 10 17:19:31 UTC 2000
Not ready for prime time yet. I found some real nasty memory leaks and
data corruption on
the server side that I would say it's broken as well. I'll have some fixes
this week.
-Kevin
At 09:03 AM 01/10/2000 -0800, Brad Knowles wrote:
>Folks,
>
> Just curious if IXFR is still not-quite-ready-for-prime-time
>under the latest public release? The last note I saw in src/CHANGES
>said:
>
> 885. [support] IXFR improvements.
>
> But the previous IXFR related entry said:
>
> 869. [bug] disable client side IXFR (in
>named-xfer) for now.
>
> And the later entry doesn't explicitly say where the
>improvements
>were made, etc....
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>--
> These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy
> ____________________________________________________________________
>|o| Brad Knowles, <blk at skynet.be> Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o|
>|o| Systems Architect, News & FTP Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o|
>|o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels |o|
>|o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o|
>\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
> Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.
> Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are.
More information about the bind-workers
mailing list