TLD nameservers that also cache?

Rick H Wesson wessorh at
Thu Jul 6 15:07:30 UTC 2000


some one else could check me on this idea.... may i suggest you just
ask the .be for their .be zone and run the .be for your self. if you don't
need to talk to them your cash won't get poluted.

this would add the maintance of getting the zone as often as makes
it available and you'll have to deal with the consequences if you miss a
new copy of the zone.


On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Brad Knowles wrote:

> 	Can anyone else think of any other solutions to this problem that 
> we're having?  Well, other than knee-capping Marc Roger, that is?  ;-)
> 	Also, is there something fundamentally flawed in the way I'm 
> thinking that perhaps caching/recursive nameservers should be 
> working?  Are there other chapters I should go re-re-re-read again?

More information about the bind-workers mailing list