Alexander Krotov: [BIND-BUGS #1023] Re: RFC 1876 (LOC RR)
Paul A Vixie
vixie at mibh.net
Sat Jul 22 01:15:24 UTC 2000
yo, chris!
------- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: ank at kama.namesurfer.com
Received: from box.mfnx.net (box.mfnx.net [204.152.184.227])
by redpaul.mibh.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) via ESMTP id EAA06912
for <vixie at redpaul.mibh.net>; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 04:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
env-from (ank at kama.namesurfer.com)
Received: from bb.rc.vix.com (bb.rc.vix.com [204.152.187.11])
by box.mfnx.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) via ESMTP id EAA86325
for <vixie at mibh.net>; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 04:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
env-from (ank at kama.namesurfer.com)
Received:
by bb.rc.vix.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id EAA24212
for bind-bugs-dist at isc.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 04:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
env-from (ank at kama.namesurfer.com)
Received: from isrv3.isc.org (isrv3.isc.org [204.152.184.87])
by bb.rc.vix.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) via ESMTP id EAA24171
for <bind-bugs-isc at bb.rc.vix.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 04:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
env-from (ank at kama.namesurfer.com)
Received: from kama.namesurfer.com (kama.namesurfer.com [194.197.118.60])
by isrv3.isc.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) via ESMTP id EAA04874
for <bind-bugs at isc.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 04:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
env-from (ank at kama.namesurfer.com)
Received: (from ank at localhost)
by kama.namesurfer.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA31892
for bind-bugs at isc.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 11:39:01 GMT
(envelope-from ank)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 14:39:01 +0300
From: Alexander Krotov <ank at namesurfer.com>
To: bind-bugs at isc.org
Subject: [BIND-BUGS #1023] Re: RFC 1876 (LOC RR)
Message-Id: <20000721143901.A31888 at namesurfer.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
Organization: NameSurfer Ltd.
Cc: bind-bugs at isc.org
Hi!
There is a (minor) bug in C code published in RFC1876 (LOC RR).
Seems the same bug is "borrowed" by BIND ;-)
Symptoms: if altitude value is negative and less than
1 meter '-' sign is not printed.
For instance altitude value -0.2m is printed as
'0.2m' both by dig and, which is more dangerous, named-xfer
version 8.2.2pl5.
The reason basicaly is a fact that 0*-1==0.
I have not checked BIND 9 rc1 yet.
Regards,
- --
Alexander Krotov gsm: +358 40-725 7216
Product Developer fax: +358 9-478 1030
NameSurfer Ltd. http://www.namesurfer.com
------- End of Forwarded Message
More information about the bind-workers
mailing list