named 8.3.4 dies under recursive cache load (with ACL'ed zones?)
david.conrad at nominum.com
Sat Feb 15 18:48:01 UTC 2003
On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 10:30 AM, Greg A. Woods wrote:
>> should upgrade to bind9 which handles this condition properly.
> So I give up on a significant number of features I find quite useful
> (and in fact almost critical in this scenario)
Out of curiosity, what features are those?
> just so that I can have a
> named that'll sit spinning its thumbs when it runs out of memory
> of one that dies ungracefully? I'm not sure what to think.
Actually, if there is a bug in BINDv8 as you suspect, then going to
BINDv9 would probably help given that there is essentially no shared
code between BINDv8 and BINDv9.
More information about the bind-workers