Option to turn off EDNS globally?

[Michael Richardson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Vixie <Paul_Vixie at isc.org> writes:
    >> sorry, just a doubt, but why RFC still appears like a "proposed
    >> standard" and not a like a draf std/standard yet,after 8 years?.
    >> 
    >> http://rfc.net/rfc3700.html 3.4.  Proposed Standard Protocols
    >> EDNS0 Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0) 2671

    Paul> beats me.  i probably forgot to do some administrative thing
    Paul> inside the IETF.
 
It's only dependancy is RFC1035, so in fact, it could have moved forward
already.   That might in fact be necessary if rfc403x (DNSSEC) want to
advance and they reference EDNS no doubt.

Advancing documents is still on the agenda for the not-really-existing
dnsext WG, I think.

- -- 
]            Bear: "Me, I'm just the shape of a bear."          |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson,    Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at xelerance.com      http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQEVAwUBRvK13YCLcPvd0N1lAQKOmwf+OCBL/ObN95oJgaOYUNnENAHupf2lMi9h
/NLPJY6IsxyLBAmijfjB7YfjhxikUjPF47hvWZdzogHwmCZ0OS0VJJU3kXXR0hI5
fJ0Ec77AaGRfV6+qMqTf0JeuD/PwAPiSWZ6PLI6CjScQ7G/IfF5NtlFE+oL7VoVk
bITf1NFGoPyzWw2lZB6G0yWnSx53KySJShmPl/4EmFq/I40LX8FrkKRz55ttozer
2bcxI9FF1FH4ANZJKWHq15CfYefYNNGyVAJfVWAEEvAgK/JQpDBqK03sRmdZ6HwH
3NLBOPyHXBv9XCEikW4QiUrqAINUj5tEEe8YDRs/ftu67vE8/oH35w==
=XXRr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----