Option to turn off EDNS globally?
Mark Andrews
Mark_Andrews at isc.org
Fri Sep 21 01:05:30 UTC 2007
> Paul,
> sorry, just a doubt, but why RFC still appears like a "proposed
> standard" and not a like a draf std/standard yet,after 8 years?.
The same reason just about all of the DNS standards work
is sitting at proposed. :-)
A change from proposed to draft or full won't make much
practical difference. The thing that will make a practical
difference is complaining to the vendor / administrator of
the offending box.
If you buy a firewall/nat box today and plug it in and it
doesn't work with EDNS return it to the place of purchase
and say why you returned it.
Mark
> http://rfc.net/rfc3700.html
> 3.4. Proposed Standard Protocols
> EDNS0 Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0) 2671
>
>
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/
> Number Title Author or Ed. Date Format More Info (Obs&Upd) Status
> RFC2671
> Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0) P. Vixie August 1999 ASCII
> PROPOSED STANDARD
>
>
> thank you,
>
> Dario.
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at isc.org
More information about the bind-workers
mailing list