[bind10-dev] Changes Log

[Cathy Almond]

>From a supportability perspective I vote 'yes' too.

One of the problems I have with the current DHCP release notes (versus
the BIND9 ones which are easier in this respect) is not being able to
match the descriptive text of an update with the tracking ID of the
actual change.  The other problem I used to have (as an ISC customer)
was understanding what the short BIND 9 descriptions meant when I was
fishing for potential fixes for problems experienced.

Your format addresses both of my problems, and I like the style and its
other features.

JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L at C#:H wrote:
> At Mon, 10 May 2010 23:25:13 -0500 (CDT),
> "Jeremy C. Reed" <jreed at isc.org> wrote:
> 
>>> This is an example changelog entry for this fix:
>> I like it. I have several change log entries I can quickly convert to 
>> your format (these were from the changes between the first and second 
>> releases).
> 
> Okay, if I don't hear other opinions or objections I'll commit the
> proposed entry with the proposed legend to trunk.  But I'm not
> intending to declare the change log style is fixed by doing so.  Maybe
> we can explicitly discuss the format in this week's call.
> 
> ---
> JINMEI, Tatuya
> _______________________________________________
> bind10-dev mailing list
> bind10-dev at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind10-dev