[bind10-dev] LIBADD/LDADD indirect library dependency linker problems

[Michal 'vorner' Vaner]

Hello

On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:38:21PM +0200, Jelte Jansen wrote:
> So, two questions;
> - - do we want to fix this (I do :), we could clean up a lot of deps in
> the makefiles if we do)

+1

> - - how do we want to do this? A dirty, but probably working way is to add
> an option to configure (that we can --disable) that modifies the intree
> libtool script if this values is set to no. What I'm not entirely sure
> of, however, is whether this causes additional problems

I think it is worth a try, it shouldn't be much work and we'll see if it causes
trouble. It looks like there's a lot to gain for such a little hack.

With regards

-- 
Why TODO list in haskell? It handles infinite data structures.

Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/attachments/20110801/9f024f8a/attachment.bin>