[bind10-dev] LIBADD/LDADD indirect library dependency linker problems

[JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉]

At Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:45:12 +0200,
Michal 'vorner' Vaner <michal.vaner at nic.cz> wrote:

> > So, two questions;
> > - - do we want to fix this (I do :), we could clean up a lot of deps in
> > the makefiles if we do)
> 
> +1

I've not fully thought about the implication, but I think I agree.

> > - - how do we want to do this? A dirty, but probably working way is to add
> > an option to configure (that we can --disable) that modifies the intree
> > libtool script if this values is set to no. What I'm not entirely sure
> > of, however, is whether this causes additional problems
> 
> I think it is worth a try, it shouldn't be much work and we'll see if it causes
> trouble. It looks like there's a lot to gain for such a little hack.

Maybe we can try to identify the rationale of the debian/ubuntu
behavior a bit harder, and if we still cannot get it or understanding
it doesn't help, we can try the hack next.  But it's not a strong
opinion.  If others want to directly go to this workaround I'm okay
with that.

---
JINMEI, Tatuya
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.