[bind10-dev] BIND 10 libraries with too generic names

[Shane Kerr]

Stephen,

On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 10:09 +0100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> 
> I think we should do the same.  I'm not certain we should include "isc"
> though, as it seems that the convention is to include the name of the
> software, not the originator. (And in any case, BIND 10 has
> contributions from multiple organisations.)  I suggest something like
> libbind10-dnsacl.la or libb10-dnsacl.la.

Names like libbind10-dnsacl make sense to me. I don't think we need to
worry about keeping these names short, as ideally they won't be typed
much by people, and I think libbind10-dnsacl is slightly clearer than
libb10-dnsacl.

I'm not sure if it makes more sense to use underscore or dash:

libbind10_dnsacl.la
libbind10-dnsacl.la

But either would be better than no prefix.


--
Shane