[bind10-dev] BIND 10 libraries with too generic names

[Jelte Jansen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/06/2011 11:09 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> 
> I think we should do the same.  I'm not certain we should include "isc"
> though, as it seems that the convention is to include the name of the
> software, not the originator. (And in any case, BIND 10 has
> contributions from multiple organisations.)  I suggest something like
> libbind10-dnsacl.la or libb10-dnsacl.la.
> 

i'd prefer b10- then, not so much because it's a whopping 2 characters less, but
it's the same we use for binaries.

but what about the libraries we kinda sorta intended to be for external use as well?

Jelte
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk4UVvAACgkQ4nZCKsdOncUMTgCfQJ/hOVkS4KxcFFLGdQWS+u+G
I7UAn3ZJd3hQ3KmWuTcdh1l1Qq5cKour
=buCp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----