[bind10-dev] coding guidelines

[Michal 'vorner' Vaner]

Hello

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 08:41:24PM +0000, Francis Dupont wrote:
> > If there would be a reason for this I didn't catch, I would say it
> > would look better to just use < > everywhere (I think I'd be willing
> > to sacrifice the distinction of local vs. global, shorter names and
> > filename completion when typing the " " header names for the simpler
> > rules).
> 
> => I was in favor of < > everywhere so if you believe restricted use
> of " " makes no sense (or removes its sense) so I am giving up too
> and recommend to the '< > everywhere' rule. BTW it is the rule applied
> in bind 9 so it is not new...
> No objection?

OK.

But I'd still like to hear the reason for not recommending " " in header files.
At least out of curiosity and for future decisions.

Thanks

With regards

-- 
Java: Write once, run everywhere
Perl: Write once, run away
Perl6: Don't write, it DWYW

Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/attachments/20121029/4b030fea/attachment.bin>