[bind10-dev] naming and versioning

Michal 'vorner' Vaner michal.vaner at nic.cz
Wed Sep 26 07:20:39 UTC 2012


Hello

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:16:54PM -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> I am also okay with 0.0 (bind10-0.0a1) or 10.0.0 (bind10-10.0.0a1) but 
> that does seem somewhat redundant).

Whenever I see something to be 1.0 or more, I expect it to be complete and well
tested. Maybe it's because I'm used to things like mplayer, which was at its 0.9
for several years, but I think 1.0 as the first release to push to people in
large is somewhat bold. I'd be for something like 0.1. For one, I think 1.0
should go with stable API too.

With regards

-- 
When a fly lands on the ceiling, does it do a half roll or a half loop?

Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/attachments/20120926/6acad00f/attachment.bin>


More information about the bind10-dev mailing list