[bind10-dev] naming and versioning

[Jeremy C. Reed]

On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:

> Whenever I see something to be 1.0 or more, I expect it to be complete 
> and well tested. Maybe it's because I'm used to things like mplayer, 
> which was at its 0.9 for several years, but I think 1.0 as the first 
> release to push to people in large is somewhat bold. I'd be for 
> something like 0.1. For one, I think 1.0 should go with stable API 
> too.

Starting at 0.1 seems fine, but we have had 21 snapshot releases. 0.1 
may be misleading or appear to be a new project. What about our first 
release be 0.22?  That seems confusing too.  That is one reason I chose 
1.0. But now I agree that 1.0 should go with the stable API (and stable 
configuration interface or syntax too).

Anyone against the following for the alpha?

AC_INIT(bind10, 0.22a, bind10-dev at isc.org)

And the official first supported release being called bind10-0.22?