[bind10-dev] change log entries missing
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
jinmei at isc.org
Thu Sep 27 04:24:28 UTC 2012
At Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:36:28 -0500 (CDT),
"Jeremy C. Reed" <jreed at isc.org> wrote:
> > I see the last month has had many merges that aren't mention in the
> > changelog.
>
> I re-ordered some below:
>
> > 2096
> > 2097
> > 2098
> > 2100
> > 2107
> > 2108
> > 2109
> > 2110
> > 2151 (well known "wildcard" LabelSequence)
> > 2218
> > 2219
> > 2267
> > 2282
These are all related to the memory-efficient version of in-memory
data source, and I don't see the need for listing each and every one
of them in the changelog (basically they are separated for the
convenience of development). This one should be enough:
482. [func] team
Memory footprint of the in-memory data source has been
substantially improved. For example, b10-auth now requires much
[...]
(Multiple Trac tickets)
but, maybe we refer to the summary ticket, #2101 instead of (or in
addition to) just saying "multiple":
(Multiple Trac tickets, Summarized in Trac #2101)
Another exception is #2151. This is an extension to the existing
public API, so it would make some sense to mention it. But this
interface is mainly intended for internal development rather than
general use case, so I'm not sure if we'd bother to refer to it. If
you want to include it ask Jelte.
> > 2161
>
> remove old datasrc API code
changelog matter is discussed in the ticket. While technically it's a
public API it's effectively rather internal refactoring, so I'd also
skip it in the changelog.
> Also 2163:
> > 2165 (part of #2163)
> [meta] use signed RRset "as is" in Message
This is probably worth mentioning. Ask Mukund.
> > 2216
>
> update query_bench so it will use the new data source config
Mostly internal. I'd skip it.
---
JINMEI, Tatuya
More information about the bind10-dev
mailing list