[bind10-dev] Migration of configuration
Michal 'vorner' Vaner
michal.vaner at nic.cz
Fri May 31 06:56:35 UTC 2013
Hello
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:57:35AM -0700, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> As for the second, while I do not necessarily oppose to the specific
> idea, I'd first consider this at a higher level, i.e., how/whether
> users should handle configuration changes. It might be some way of
> automatic conversion or it may be okay to ask them to fix. There can
> be some middleground, of course, and it's quite possible that it may
> not be "one policy fits all cases". On clarifying these, we can then
> discuss how to do that. I guess these will be part of configuration
> overhaul.
For one, I think we should not upgrade the configuration without their knowledge
-- at least unless we are able to downgrade the configuration back automatically
as well.
On the other hand, I think leaving it completely on them doesn't sound right
either, because:
• They should never be asked to edit the JSON file directly.
• Even with some offline-configuration, if there are few hundred zones,
modifying an option at all of them is tedious.
So, I would be inclined to some kind of script that can upgrade the
configuration, possibly with asking some questions (something like make
oldconfig on linux kernel, maybe less verbose).
With regards
--
This email was generated by a biological random generator.
If you want more random text, just respond to this email.
Michal 'vorner' Vaner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind10-dev/attachments/20130531/587185b9/attachment.bin>
More information about the bind10-dev
mailing list