BIND 10 #422: Implement memory Data Source Class

[BIND 10 Development]

#422: Implement memory Data Source Class
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
      Reporter:  zzchen_pku   |        Owner:  jinmei   
          Type:  task         |       Status:  reviewing
      Priority:  major        |    Milestone:           
     Component:  data source  |   Resolution:           
      Keywords:               |    Sensitive:  0        
Estimatedhours:  0.0          |        Hours:  0        
      Billable:  1            |   Totalhours:  0        
      Internal:  0            |  
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by zzchen_pku):

  * owner:  zzchen_pku => jinmei


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:8 jinmei]:
 > I made some editorial suggestions in r3850.  Please check.
 Thank you.
 > One final thing: we can omit "isc::datasrc::" within that particular
 namespace or after 'using namespace isc::datasrc', so, for example, this
 one
 > {{{
 > isc::datasrc::result::Result
 > MemoryDataSrc::addZone(ZonePtr zone) {
 > }}}
 > can be this:
 > {{{
 > result::Result
 > MemoryDataSrc::addZone(ZonePtr zone) {
 > }}}
 >
 > Different developers seem to have different opinions on how much
 specific we can/should be about namespace specification, so you were
 intentionally redundant.  I personally think it makes sense to keep things
 concise (e.g. by avoiding too long lines) when they can safely be so, and
 being specific while doing 'using namespace xxx' doesn't make much sense
 anyway, so I'd suggest the latter way.  But you did it intentionally with
 a strong preference I wouldn't insist on my preference.  (maybe we should
 discuss this at project-wide in January)
 That's ok for me, we should make code more concise. I have updated the
 code in r3853, please check.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/422#comment:9>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development