BIND 10 #849: DBus as possible replacement of MSGQ.
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Fri Apr 15 09:19:20 UTC 2011
#849: DBus as possible replacement of MSGQ.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vorner | Owner: vorner
Type: task | Status: reviewing
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: | Sprint-20110419
Unclassified | Resolution:
Keywords: | Sensitive: 0
Estimated Number of Hours: 0.0 | Add Hours to Ticket: 0
Billable?: 1 | Total Hours: 0
Internal?: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by stephen):
* owner: stephen => vorner
Comment:
> Well, it depends. We don't really want to distribute dbus ourself, do
we? Just dynamically link libdbus (and it would be the same thing authors
of proprietary extensions would do as well, I guess).
Some used of BIND (including those putting it in embedded systems) might
need to link statically. However is Skype can do it, I guess that BIND 10
users can as well.
> ...and the bindings handle the rest.
That's what I call optimism :-) But seriously, I'm surprised that there
is no fully-supported C++ binding it it were that easy.
> TCP Support...
All you say is very true.
I suggest that you close this ticket now; it won't preclude anyone from
adding comments, but you've done all the work you're likely to do on it.
The comparison between alternatives can be done under #765.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/849#comment:6>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list