BIND 10 #849: DBus as possible replacement of MSGQ.

BIND 10 Development do-not-reply at isc.org
Fri Apr 15 09:19:20 UTC 2011


#849: DBus as possible replacement of MSGQ.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                 Reporter:  vorner   |                Owner:  vorner
                     Type:  task     |               Status:  reviewing
                 Priority:  major    |            Milestone:
                Component:           |  Sprint-20110419
  Unclassified                       |           Resolution:
                 Keywords:           |            Sensitive:  0
Estimated Number of Hours:  0.0      |  Add Hours to Ticket:  0
                Billable?:  1        |          Total Hours:  0
                Internal?:  0        |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by stephen):

 * owner:  stephen => vorner


Comment:

 > Well, it depends. We don't really want to distribute dbus ourself, do
 we? Just dynamically link libdbus (and it would be the same thing authors
 of proprietary extensions would do as well, I guess).
 Some used of BIND (including those putting it in embedded systems) might
 need to link statically.  However is Skype can do it, I guess that BIND 10
 users can as well.

 > ...and the bindings handle the rest.
 That's what I call optimism :-)  But seriously, I'm surprised that there
 is no fully-supported C++ binding it it were that easy.

 > TCP Support...
 All you say is very true.

 I suggest that you close this ticket now; it won't preclude anyone from
 adding comments, but you've done all the work you're likely to do on it.
 The comparison between alternatives can be done under #765.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/849#comment:6>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development


More information about the bind10-tickets mailing list