BIND 10 #849: DBus as possible replacement of MSGQ.
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Fri Apr 15 12:34:34 UTC 2011
#849: DBus as possible replacement of MSGQ.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vorner | Owner: vorner
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: | Sprint-20110419
Unclassified | Resolution: complete
Keywords: | Sensitive: 0
Estimated Number of Hours: 0.0 | Add Hours to Ticket: 1
Billable?: 1 | Total Hours: 0
Internal?: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vorner):
* hours: 0 => 1
* status: reviewing => closed
* resolution: => complete
Comment:
Hello
Replying to [comment:6 stephen]:
> > ...and the bindings handle the rest.
> That's what I call optimism :-) But seriously, I'm surprised that there
is no fully-supported C++ binding it it were that easy.
It's always optimism to say that it does what it is designed to do, but
it's easier to say than „it handles 94.6% of the rest“ ;-).
Anyway, the reason for not having C++ bindings is that actually, dbus is
mostly for desktop and desktop applications which are written using a
toolkit. Both Qt and glib have good bindings, but they are close to the
philosophy of the library and I don't think we would like to start using
Qt in BIND because of that. These days, nobody really writes in plain C++
(at last not for the desktop).
> I suggest that you close this ticket now; it won't preclude anyone from
adding comments, but you've done all the work you're likely to do on it.
The comparison between alternatives can be done under #765.
Yes, it makes sense. OK.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/849#comment:7>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list