BIND 10 #1061: introduce DatabaseClient (or DatabaseDataSourceClient)

[BIND 10 Development]

#1061: introduce DatabaseClient (or DatabaseDataSourceClient)
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
                   Reporter:         |                 Owner:  jinmei
  jinmei                             |                Status:  reviewing
                       Type:  task   |             Milestone:
                   Priority:  major  |  Sprint-20110816
                  Component:  data   |            Resolution:
  source                             |             Sensitive:  0
                   Keywords:         |           Sub-Project:  DNS
            Defect Severity:  N/A    |  Estimated Difficulty:  5.0
Feature Depending on Ticket:         |           Total Hours:  0
        Add Hours to Ticket:  0      |
                  Internal?:  0      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vorner):

 * owner:  vorner => jinmei


Comment:

 Hello

 Replying to [comment:12 jinmei]:
 > After thinking about it more, I came up with another possible name
 > "DatabaseAccessor".  It may share the same concern as that for the
 > original "DatabaseConnection", but would this one perhaps sound
 > better (while addressing my own concerns)?
 >
 > Or is there anything that can better address both concerns?

 Well, I used Abstraction, because I couldn't come with anything better,
 Accessor looks slightly better than that. I believe it addresses Stephens
 concern as well, as database accessor isn't something commonly used to
 name something. So I used your idea.

 Thank you

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1061#comment:14>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development