BIND 10 #928: Add statistics category into spec file of each module, and update cfgmgr to handle it
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Tue Jul 26 08:46:55 UTC 2011
#928: Add statistics category into spec file of each module, and update cfgmgr to
handle it
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner: jelte
naokikambe | Status: reviewing
Type: | Milestone:
enhancement | Sprint-20110802
Priority: major | Resolution:
Component: | Sensitive: 0
configuration | Sub-Project: DNS
Keywords: | Estimated Difficulty: 5.0
Defect Severity: N/A | Total Hours: 0
Feature Depending on Ticket: |
Add Hours to Ticket: 0 |
Internal?: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by naokikambe):
* owner: naokikambe => jelte
Comment:
Thank you for reviewing.
Replying to [comment:6 jelte]:
> I think it would be wise to also add some code to check the
specification of the statistics itself; see the function
check_data_specification() in module_spec.cc (which starts the checks for
config items and commands). Looks like right now the actual specs for
statistics are the same as those for config items so a new function
check_statistics_item_list could probably be a copy of that (or it could
just call that function if they are exactly the same). I'm worried that if
we make a mistake in the specs for statistics it'll fail at a seemingly
random point later.
That's right. I added check_statistics_item_list and the related methods
into module_spec.cc.
Please see git e454c03a1226fbc90d7f58229a91f3e4bc3775c3 in trac929 (not in
trac928, Sorry for confusion.)
> Are statistics mandatory in a spec? (i see there are a lot places where
statistics is defined in the specfile for a module but it's just an empty
list) Not that I have a big problem with that but if they are optional we
probably don't need that.
Not mandatory. I removed empty statistics categories. Please see git
7018b05373f706d54a6a0fc2d8977c44292b273f in trac928.
> meta-question: what's the final commit there? a merge of the branch
itself? (3225575a1d7dc447b802efe5cc15687465acbbc4)
I mistook pushing. I repushed in forcely. Please repull from the remote
branches.
Sorry for inconvenience.
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/928#comment:7>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list