BIND 10 #1390: update b10-auth to pass IXFR-request to xfrout
BIND 10 Development
do-not-reply at isc.org
Fri Nov 18 17:38:24 UTC 2011
#1390: update b10-auth to pass IXFR-request to xfrout
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner: jelte
jinmei | Status: reviewing
Type: task | Milestone:
Priority: major | Sprint-20111122
Component: | Resolution:
b10-auth | Sensitive: 0
Keywords: | Sub-Project: DNS
Defect Severity: N/A | Estimated Difficulty: 0
Feature Depending on Ticket: | Total Hours: 0
Add Hours to Ticket: 0 |
Internal?: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vorner):
Hello
I made a small whitespace change, there were spaces at the end of lines.
As for the comments to the branch:
* In the test checking the successful scenario, should it check that the
auth provides no answer at all?
* There are two „# TODO: Log?“. Maybe we should decide and maybe really
log.
* Indentation here (the lower line doesn't start at just after the
opening parenthesis):
{{{#!diff
- sendAnswer = impl_->processAxfrQuery(io_message, message,
buffer,
+ sendAnswer = impl_->processXfrQuery(io_message, message,
buffer,
tsig_context);
}}}
{{{#!diff
- makeErrorMessage(message, buffer, Rcode::NOTIMP(),
tsig_context);
+ sendAnswer = impl_->processXfrQuery(io_message, message,
buffer,
+ tsig_context);
}}}
This one many times:
{{{#!diff
+ UnitTestUtil::createRequestMessage(request_message, opcode,
default_qid,
+ Name("example.com"), RRClass::IN(),
RRType::IXFR());
}}}
This changes the external behaviour, so I think this would need a
changelog entry.
Thank you
--
Ticket URL: <http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/1390#comment:4>
BIND 10 Development <http://bind10.isc.org>
BIND 10 Development
More information about the bind10-tickets
mailing list