Politically correct way of building dhcp?

David W. Hankins David_Hankins at isc.org
Tue Jun 21 15:10:24 UTC 2005


On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 10:49:36PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> What's the politically correct way of convincing it to use
> specific/additional compiler flags? Like I'd like to build it with -O2 -Wall
> for example.

Edit site.conf, what you enter in site.conf is inserted into the makefiles
between 'Makefile.conf' and the target makefile (in each subdirectory).

So you can over-ride or manipulate the 'COPTS' variable for your
platform.

> Are there any plans to use GNU autoconf/automake etc down the track?

An autoconf build environment is on the wishlist for a future release.


Note that building at -O2 and -Wall will produce some warnings.  The
heritage of the build environment has been -g.  It only recently moved
to -O -g on some gcc platforms, which enabled some additional warnings
and were silenced.

-O2 enables another set of warnings, and they will be triggered.

So -O2 -Wall -Werror probably isn't advisable unless you enjoy pain.

-- 
David W. Hankins		"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer			you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.		-- Jack T. Hankins


More information about the dhcp-hackers mailing list