PATCH for server/dhcp.c
David W. Hankins
David_Hankins at isc.org
Tue Mar 21 21:43:35 UTC 2006
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 12:07:27PM -0600, Brian T wrote:
> So, I added an entry for nak_lease() and it seemed to fixe the problem. Is there a reason why this shouldn't be added?
If a client is known to be on the wrong physical network, that's a good
reason to NAK a lease.
If the client is not allowed the lease it is asked for (administrative
prohibition), that is also a good reason to NAK a lease.
But if we merely don't know what lease the client is asking about, that's
a pretty bad reason to NAK a lease (as Ted has pointed out).
See also:
http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/authoritative.php
--
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
More information about the dhcp-hackers
mailing list