Failover strangeness
David W. Hankins
David_Hankins at isc.org
Thu Nov 2 22:44:36 UTC 2006
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 10:34:40AM -0500, Greg G wrote:
> 4. Primary comes back up. Secondary goes to normal mode.
> 5. Secondary continues to handle the lease.
This is normal, isn't it? The client in question has been given
a server-id for its lease, and renewals always go via unicast
the identified server.
It won't change until the client loses its binding and finds a new
one (eg reboots), but even so some clients will skip rebind and
still manage to contact a different server.
> 6. I told the primary to operate in partner-down. It went back to
> normal mode in about 2 seconds. (This also forces a peer update.)
Why would you do this while the secondary was operating?
I'm not sure what effects this will have upon the software. I
honestly have never tested it. It's probably the reason you
are getting 'no free leases'. But that's a guess.
This doesn't sound like a good idea to me, anyway.
--
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list