known client ending up in unknown pool

James Clark Calloway callowayj at ornl.gov
Thu Nov 9 20:24:18 UTC 2006


Shared and identified as such.

In this case the fixed address was valid
for the one it was physically connected to ...
one of these was a workstation that had not
moved in quite some time.

Thanks in advance.



On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Simon Hobson wrote:

> James Clark Calloway wrote:
>
> <snip>
>> host ahostdef {
>>       hardware ethernet mac;
>>       fixed-address (good ip);
>>       option host-name   "host";
>>       option domain-name "domain";
>> }
>
> You don't say anything about the network topology. Is it a shared
> network ? If so, is it correctly identified as such ?
>
> When a client gets a 'wrong' address, is it's fixed address in the
> host statement valid for the subnet it's physically connected to ?
>
>
>


More information about the dhcp-users mailing list