tuning for maximum dhcp performance

David W. Hankins David_Hankins at isc.org
Mon Apr 28 15:01:06 UTC 2008

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:21:39PM -0400, Dan wrote:
> I was happy to see the batching feature, in addition to the DHCPLEASEQUERY 
> support, in 3.1.x, but I need LDAP support which hasn't seemed to have 
> publicly made the jump.
> Although, I'd really like to get my hands on the patch that extends 
> dhcp-eval to have an ldapsearch() -- I'm sure that would apply to 3.1.x 
> easier.

we've got an ldap patch queued i think, it'll appear in a 4.x
(probably as a compile-time option).

> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, David W. Hankins wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 02:47:02PM -0400, Dan wrote:
> >>I would still prefer keeping the fsync, although I'd be curious to know 
> >>how
> >>many people are running systems without the fsync or on a ramdrive.
> >
> >you might try 3.1.0a1, esp. if you have a benchmarking rig still

man...sometimes i wonder about myself.

that's 4.1.0a1.

David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.	-- Jack T. Hankins

More information about the dhcp-users mailing list