Supported format for Client Identifier.

Ted Lemon Ted.Lemon at
Tue Jun 16 19:54:03 UTC 2009

On Jun 16, 2009, at 5:39 AM, pat wrote:
> Since RFC4361 supersedes RFC2132, is it safe to ask Redback to  
> implement it using the format specified in RFC 4361?

Nothing is ever perfectly safe, but the RFC4361 client identifier  
format is backwards-compatible with RFC2132, so it would take a very,  
very broken implementation to choke on it.

More information about the dhcp-users mailing list