perl-list at network1.net
Fri Apr 16 13:22:08 UTC 2010
It is indeed a host record with fixed-address statement. So there is no lease to release from the DHCP server's perspective. The client thinks there is, however, and seems to have no way to tell. Is this a wise design choice? I know it has been that way for a long time, but technically the address was "leased" from the client's perspective.
On Apr 15, 2010, at 18:29 , David W. Hankins wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 03:40:58PM -0400, Darren wrote:
>> The difference I see here is that the release ended up on server-1 instead of server-2. It still wasn't "found", however.
>> Since the release does not "find" the lease, no event is generated which is causing some problems in some other areas.
>> Any idea what the deal is? Is this fixed in the 4.x.x tree?
> Is this a host record with a fixed-address statement?
> Host records have no state, and therefore no events.
> David W. Hankins BIND 10 needs more DHCP voices.
> Software Engineer There just aren't enough in our heads.
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. http://bind10.isc.org/
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
More information about the dhcp-users