dhcp fails with big dhcpd.leases
Simon Hobson
dhcp1 at thehobsons.co.uk
Tue Aug 31 18:09:34 UTC 2010
Sten Carlsen wrote:
>You showed that your range also had 172.16.8.0 in it, that is valid
>but may cause some clients to behave "funny".
I'd missed that.
>subnet 172.16.0.0 netmask 255.252.0.0 {
> authoritative;
> option subnet-mask 255.252.0.0;
> option routers 172.16.0.1;
> option domain-name "moben";
> option domain-name-servers 10.2.0.1;
> option interface-mtu 1450;
> default-lease-time 72000;
> max-lease-time 72000;
> range 172.16.8.0 172.19.255.254;
That range is over a quarter of a million addresses. Does the server
still have issues with very large ranges ? I vaguely recall there
used to be issues with memory usage and startup times.
It does sound a rather excessive number of addresses - even for a
public access point.
--
Simon Hobson
Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/ for books by acclaimed
author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as
Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books.
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list