dhcp fails with big dhcpd.leases
dorian
dorian33 at o2.pl
Tue Aug 31 18:28:10 UTC 2010
> Sten Carlsen wrote:
>
>> You showed that your range also had 172.16.8.0 in it, that is valid
>> but may cause some clients to behave "funny".
>
> I'd missed that.
>
>> subnet 172.16.0.0 netmask 255.252.0.0 {
>> authoritative;
>> option subnet-mask 255.252.0.0;
>> option routers 172.16.0.1;
>> option domain-name "moben";
>> option domain-name-servers 10.2.0.1;
>> option interface-mtu 1450;
>> default-lease-time 72000;
>> max-lease-time 72000;
>> range 172.16.8.0 172.19.255.254;
>
> That range is over a quarter of a million addresses. Does the server
> still have issues with very large ranges ?
Yes it is.
And even if not - in my opinion this doesn't concern the point of the
problem...
> I vaguely recall there used to be issues with memory usage and startup
> times.
The host is equipped with 16GB RAM so...
>
> It does sound a rather excessive number of addresses - even for a
> public access point.
>
As above: this is not a point of the problem - or maybe is it? But if so
please say it clearly.
Are there any limits on served IP ranges or classes?
I need such big IP range since in fact I have a network of hotspots
working in bridge and centrally controlled from one host.
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list