Issues with next-server & filename
Simon Hobson
dhcp1 at thehobsons.co.uk
Wed Dec 1 07:43:05 UTC 2010
Chris Marget wrote:
>I'm experiencing weirdness along these lines as well. In my case,
>all of the expected options are passed correctly If I remove the
>host declaration, allowing the host to land on a random IP address.
>
>Do you see any difference by commenting out the host declaration?
Also, try removing the host declaration from the subnet and putting
it in the global scope where it belongs. In this case it shouldn't
make any difference, but when multiple subnets are involved then it
can cause some weird (and hard to diagnose) inheritance problems if
you put host statements anywhere but in the global scope. Being in a
group at the global level is OK.
Ie, try this :
subnet 10.11.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
<options>
range dynamic-bootp 10.11.1.95 10.11.1.96;
}
group {
next-server 10.11.1.91;
filename "pxelinux.0";
host ops1tt {
hardware ethernet 00:0c:29:05:6a:82;
fixed-address 10.11.1.94;
}
}
--
Simon Hobson
Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/ for books by acclaimed
author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as
Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books.
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list