Production Deployment -- Version Questions

[Jiri Popelka]

On 05/26/2010 10:39 PM, Joshua West wrote:
> On 05/26/10 11:22, Jiri Popelka wrote:
>    
>> Hi,
>>
>> you can take a look at the dhcp.spec (4.1.1) from Fedora
>> http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/dhcp/devel/
>>
>> It's actually nearly the same as in forthcoming RHEL-6.
>>
>> Jiri Popelka
>> Red Hat, inc.
>>      
> Hey Jiri,
>
> Ok I've adjusted the 1.306 CVS revision of dhcp.spec to build on RHEL5.
>
> Basically, there were only a few changes... had to:
>
>     * Remove requirement of libcap-ng; patch ignored later.
>     * Ignore three patches (CLOEXEC, noipv6, capabilities).
>     * Not run autoreconf.
>
> I've attached the new .spec which builds on RHEL5.  These changes are
> mentioned in the Changelog.
>
> If you have any recommendations as to how to get the three ignored
> patches actually working on RHEL5 w/ 2.6.18.x kernel, especially the
> noipv6 one, I'd be most interested.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
>    

Hi,

you are doing it well.
What do you mentioned in Changelog is correct.
You can ignore the CLOEXEC and capabilities patches.

I'm attaching the recreated noipv6 patch and your (slightly modified) 
spec file.

Enjoy,

Jiri
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: dhcp-4.1.1-missing-ipv6-not-fatal.patch
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20100528/f170f9cb/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: dhcp.spec-brandeis
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20100528/f170f9cb/attachment-0001.ksh>