Fwd: Deny bootp vs deny dynamic bootp clients

[Matthew Causey]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm running "deny dynamic bootp clients;" for each of my pools running
failover (running 4.x).  In my testing, it didn't matter because once I
enabled failover BOOTP clients still didn't get leases, whether I had
that set on the pool or not.

- --
Matt


On 3/2/11 8:57 AM, Tim Maestas wrote:
> Bumping this - does anyone know?
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Tim Maestas <tmaestas95 at gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:18 PM
> Subject: Deny bootp vs deny dynamic bootp clients
> To: dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> 
> 
> In DHCP version 3.1.3 where DHCP failover is in use, what is the
> proper way to ignore all BOOTP requests on a subnet?  Is putting "deny
> bootp;" in the subnet declaration sufficient?  Or do I need to "deny
> dynamic bootp clients;" in the pool declaration as the dhcpd.conf
> manpage suggests?  I've seen conflicting posts on the web concerning
> whether that requirement is still valid post-3.0.  If this is still
> required do I need to put it in the pool, or can I put it in the
> subnet?
> 
> Thanks.
> -Tim
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNbyjkAAoJEDdM1ngAf7fy9WoIAKIJYpfPsM4rsLe8QdxcGxU9
ZehuNUKbg1csTW3D1LbFjn/NJzaWZ3nrC8Mm8uBeKogcSdW8vfE5z0k+U09GisSm
2b2fPGtU4JGNkJhHAcx4Fl4YxfwiQBHBCCdCNfWQFbpmB3nm8hrQPowLOqstrF6E
dL/xAXs8sSY5yvqkpIL0HXVbe9lLMUYrz5jx3BeMb6bFG+1uTrJhHz5YWPe9NA0R
qXG8amgWtlc++dZKZlFf++W6yVWVxjbf96C/rjGLmRLgdtB4mtnwA8ev3JsAPcvA
IICuCqmxH+mK3DcZXdkuu32drGuvQAtUA1fGYi9aqderH0oX5mrWophXpyFftwg=
=SNS9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----