agent.remote-id problem

Matej Serc mailing at tam.si
Wed Sep 28 11:36:53 UTC 2011


For example here:
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/2010-November/012299.html it
seems that it works with 4.2.X version.

The difference is that I would like to use agent.remote-id instead of
agent.circuit-id. Does anyone use it?

Thanks,
Matej Serc

2011/9/27 Simon Hobson <dhcp1 at thehobsons.co.uk>

> At 14:42 +0200 27/9/11, Matej Serc wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have searched many mailing lists to get this problem solved, but I can't
>> find any appropriate solution. The basic idea is to get a static IP
>> assignment to devices using the following clauses:
>>
>> host temp { option agent.remote-id "value"; fixed-address IP; }
>>
>> Currently we have mutiple pools (with size of 1 IP) and classes etc. and
>> would like to get rid of them.
>>
>
> AFAIK, multiple single-address pools and classes are still the only way to
> do this.
>
> --
> Simon Hobson
>
> Visit http://www.**magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/<http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/>for books by acclaimed
> author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as
> Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books.
> ______________________________**_________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/**listinfo/dhcp-users<https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20110928/8fb89fc4/attachment.html>


More information about the dhcp-users mailing list