Vendor option being deleted
swedekind at bluecatnetworks.com
Tue Oct 16 16:15:33 UTC 2012
Great question. Using the same theory I was able to reproduce the problem on each corresponding vendor code in that list. Other vendor codes (6) in the same space don't trigger the message.
WARNING: server ignoring option OptionCode58 in configuration file.
WARNING: server ignoring option OptionCode59 in configuration file.
WARNING: server ignoring option OptionCode51 in configuration file.
option space MyVendorName;
option MyVendorName.WorkingVendorOption code 6 = unsigned integer 16;
option MyVendorName.OptionCode51 code 51 = unsigned integer 16;
option MyVendorName.OptionCode58 code 58 = unsigned integer 16;
option MyVendorName.OptionCode59 code 59 = unsigned integer 16;
subnet 220.127.116.11 netmask 255.255.255.0
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
option broadcast-address 18.104.22.168;
option routers 22.214.171.124;
option MyVendorName.WorkingVendorOption 123;
option MyVendorName.OptionCode58 123;
option MyVendorName.OptionCode59 1111;
option MyVendorName.OptionCode51 222;
range 126.96.36.199 188.8.131.52;
Does changing "58" to something else, say "1" make the error go away
(other than now sending the wrong code)? If so that would be a pretty
good clue that you are on the right track.
> Can anyone verify this is a bug?
> During a recent migration from a much older DHCPD server to one based upon =
> DHCP-4.1-ESV-R6, it was noticed that a vendor option wasn't functioning, an=
> d the log file reported that the option was being ignored during the dhcpd =
> service startup. I don't own the server, so I can't easily provide the ent=
> ire log file or conf file. Removing the
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dhcp-users