DHCP server failover behind relay

Vadym Abramchuk abramm at gmail.com
Thu Sep 6 20:12:11 UTC 2012

2012/9/6 Glenn Satchell <glenn.satchell at uniq.com.au>
> That's pretty dumb, but I guess you have to live with it. Saw the other
> reply - 40 subnets is too many to provision 40 relay systems, so scratch
> that idea.
> So that leaves the iptables -j TEE solution. That looks like it would be
> ok.
>  Not ideal, but satisfactory.
> My guess is the next network equipment refresh won't include those Dell
> switches :)
Just tried -j TEE and got the local loop with two servers copying packets
to each other :(.
Any idea on how to avoid this? TTL check looks weird.

Vadym Abramchuk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20120906/977a0761/attachment.html>

More information about the dhcp-users mailing list