cannot change ip address in pool (fixed question)
rudy at grumpydevil.homelinux.org
Fri Sep 14 22:24:01 UTC 2012
In this case, doing it wrong actually imposes cost -- and from time to
time very noticeable cost -- on others.
On 15-09-12 00:19, Sten Carlsen wrote:
> I agree also. This is a vivid example of the case I so often pledge:
> there is no value in cheating when doing things right does not cost more.
> I see so often in every branch of work that things are done wrong but
> at the exact same cost as doing it right, except for thinking a bit.
> On 14/09/12 21:15, perl-list wrote:
>> But what I wrote is a fairly accurate statement. If someone cannot
>> figure out that the DHCP protocol requires a device to stop using an
>> address once the lease runs out then they shouldn't be writing code
>> (or writing the spec) for anything.
>> I agree with you there
>> dhcp-users mailing list
>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> Best regards
> Sten Carlsen
> No improvements come from shouting:
> "MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!"
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dhcp-users