cannot change ip address in pool (fixed question)

[Rudy Zijlstra]

In this case, doing it wrong actually imposes cost -- and from time to 
time very noticeable cost -- on others.

On 15-09-12 00:19, Sten Carlsen wrote:
> I agree also. This is a vivid example of the case I so often pledge: 
> there is no value in cheating when doing things right does not cost more.
>
> I see so often in every branch of work that things are done wrong but 
> at the exact same cost as doing it right, except for thinking a bit.
>
>
> On 14/09/12 21:15, perl-list wrote:
>>
>>
>>     But what I wrote is a fairly accurate statement. If someone cannot
>>     figure out that the DHCP protocol requires a device to stop using an
>>     address once the lease runs out then they shouldn't be writing code
>>     (or writing the spec) for anything.
>>
>>
>> I agree with you there
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcp-users mailing list
>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>
> -- 
> Best regards
>
> Sten Carlsen
>
> No improvements come from shouting:
>         "MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20120915/7ec47970/attachment.html>