Remove the unspecified gateway from linux routing table
Eugène Ngontang
sympavali at gmail.com
Tue Feb 17 16:35:45 UTC 2015
Hi,
No as you can see , they are connected to separated VLANs. But as I also
told you, the issue is just for this single client, the other with same
characteristics and OS are working fine.
Regards,
Eugène NG
2015-02-17 15:49 GMT+01:00 Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie>:
> At Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:42:52 +0100,
> Eugène Ngontang wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yes I guess there is a dhcp relay (10.10.10.18 in the below logs) :
> [...]
>
> > 2015-02-17 13:24 GMT+01:00 Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie>:
> >
> > I would add:
> >
> > - Are the client ("remote linux machine") and DHCP server
> > connected
> > to the same network?
> > - If not, is a DHCP relay in use?
>
> You answered the second question without answering the first.
> This makes it difficult to offer you useful advice.
>
> > - What is shown in the DHCP server logs?
> > - What is shown in the *client* leases file?
> > - Is the DHCP response actually reaching the client, and in good
> > time?
> > [The presence of a route for 169.254.0.0/16 suggests to me not.]
>
> Niall O'Reilly
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>
--
ngonta_e at epitech.net
sympavali at gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------
*Aux hommes il faut un chef, et au*
* chef il faut des hommes!L'habit ne fait pas le moine, mais lorsqu'on te
voit on te juge!*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20150217/5b367ab5/attachment.html>
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list