dhcpd 4.2.4 vs 4.3.5

[Bill Shirley]

I have:
dhcp-4.2.5-23.fc19.x86_64
dhcp-server-4.3.6-9.fc27.x86_64
running in a pair.  Also:
dhcp-4.2.5-23.fc19.x86_64
dhcp-4.3.1-12.fc21.x86_64
in a pair.

Bill

On 4/12/2019 4:28 PM, Gregory Sloop wrote:
> Re: dhcpd 4.2.4 vs 4.3.5 I should have added - I've read the release notes [mainly searching for "peer"], and there's not much 
> mentioned about changes in peer communications or the peer underpinnings - so I'd *guess* they'll talk fine - but having 
> someone with some real knowledge weigh in would be a lot more helpful in making me feel fairly confident it will.
>
> [I just don't want to turn off a 4.2.4 and bring up a 4.3.5 and have it make a hash of things, so it's quite difficult to go 
> back to 4.2.4, and suddenly I don't have any working DHCP servers!]
>
> Again, thanks for any light someone might shed on this!
>
> -Greg
>
>
>
> 	This is mostly for ISC dev staff, [or anyone else who might know]
>
> Should failover peers running 4.2.4 talk to another peer running 4.3.5 properly?
> Or are there differences large enough between the two versions to prevent them from working as a pair?
>
> [Reason - I'm upgrading a pair of 4.2.4's to 4.3.5 - and moving one of the pair to 4.3.5 and then the other also to 4.3.5 
> seems like a very nice way to manage the upgrade. But they'll have to work together well to do it this way.]
>
> -Greg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20190413/0278b960/attachment.html>