dhcpd 4.2.4 vs 4.3.5
bill at c3po.polymerindustries.biz
Sat Apr 13 11:01:03 UTC 2019
running in a pair. Also:
in a pair.
On 4/12/2019 4:28 PM, Gregory Sloop wrote:
> Re: dhcpd 4.2.4 vs 4.3.5 I should have added - I've read the release notes [mainly searching for "peer"], and there's not much
> mentioned about changes in peer communications or the peer underpinnings - so I'd *guess* they'll talk fine - but having
> someone with some real knowledge weigh in would be a lot more helpful in making me feel fairly confident it will.
> [I just don't want to turn off a 4.2.4 and bring up a 4.3.5 and have it make a hash of things, so it's quite difficult to go
> back to 4.2.4, and suddenly I don't have any working DHCP servers!]
> Again, thanks for any light someone might shed on this!
> This is mostly for ISC dev staff, [or anyone else who might know]
> Should failover peers running 4.2.4 talk to another peer running 4.3.5 properly?
> Or are there differences large enough between the two versions to prevent them from working as a pair?
> [Reason - I'm upgrading a pair of 4.2.4's to 4.3.5 - and moving one of the pair to 4.3.5 and then the other also to 4.3.5
> seems like a very nice way to manage the upgrade. But they'll have to work together well to do it this way.]
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dhcp-users